
Aferiy P280 vs Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)

Aferiy P280 leads by 27 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
- Home backup: Aferiy P280 — more AC-delivered capacity and higher AC output
- Camping & RV: Aferiy P280 — lighter and easier to carry
Score breakdown
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
Wall and solar recharge speed.
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
2,048 Wh. Show source
claimed sourceaferiy.com ↗2026-07-27The marketing number — total cell capacity.
1,741 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
1,505 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
1,279 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
Same-device runtime
| Device | Aferiy P280 | Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 24.2 nights | about 17.8 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 3.9 nights | about 2.9 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 28 hours | about 20 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 97 hours | about 71 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 54 hours | about 39 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 87 full charges | about 63 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | Aferiy P280 | Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 1,741 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourceaferiy.com ↗2026-07-27 | 1,279 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Continuous power output | 2,800 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com ↗ | 2,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Surge power output | 5,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com ↗ | 3,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Max solar input | 1,200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com ↗ | 900 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| AC charge time (0–100%) | — | 66 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Weight | 21.6 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com ↗ | 23.9 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Rated cycle life | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com ↗ | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
Only show differences
- AC-delivered capacity1,741 Wh1,279 Wh
- Continuous power output2,800 W2,000 W
- Surge power output5,600 W3,600 W
- Max solar input1,200 W900 W
- AC charge time (0–100%)—66 min
- Weight21.6 kg23.9 kg
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
Quick answers
- Is the Aferiy P280 better than the Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- Aferiy P280 leads by 27 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the Aferiy P280 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Aferiy P280, by 462 Wh — 1,741 Wh versus 1,279 Wh, a 36% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 7.7 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
- Which has more AC output, the Aferiy P280 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Aferiy P280: 2,800 W versus 2,000 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 2,000 W both run it, above 2,800 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 5,600 W against 3,600 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
- How does runtime compare between the Aferiy P280 and Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Aferiy P280 runs longer: 27.6 hours against 20.3. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
- Which is lighter, the Aferiy P280 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Aferiy P280, by 2.3 kg (21.6 kg versus 23.9 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Aferiy P280 for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Aferiy P280 →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- See more alternatives to Aferiy P280 →
- See more alternatives to Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →