← Compare

Aferiy P280 vs Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)

Aferiy P280 — front view

Aferiy P280

74BatteryRank score · Excellent
Check price on Amazon
Decision readout
Better station

Aferiy P280 leads by 27 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) — front view

Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)

47BatteryRank score · Limited
Check price on Amazon
What changes the decision
01 · Score evidence

Score breakdown

74
Aferiy P280
Overall
47
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
82
POWER
Aferiy P280 +55
27

Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.

82
TRUST
Tied
82

Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.

69
CHARGING
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) +7
76

Wall and solar recharge speed.

51
LIVABILITY
Aferiy P280 +25
26

Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.

Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.

02 · Usable energy

Capacity truth

The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.

Aferiy P280
Rated (on the box)
2,048 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com2026-07-27

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
1,741 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
Rated (on the box)
1,505 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com2026-07-04

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
1,279 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

03 · Same assumptions

Same-device runtime

Estimated runtime for the same sourced devices on Aferiy P280 and Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
DeviceAferiy P280Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)Assumption
CPAP (humidifier off)about 24.2 nightsabout 17.8 nights9 W ·
CPAP (heated humidifier on)about 3.9 nightsabout 2.9 nights56 W ·
Refrigerator (full-size)about 28 hoursabout 20 hours180 W × 35% duty cycle ·
Wi-Fi router + modemabout 97 hoursabout 71 hours18 W ·
Laptop (65W charger)about 54 hoursabout 39 hours65 W × 50% duty cycle ·
Phone (one full charge)about 87 full chargesabout 63 full charges20 W ·

One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →

04 · Sourced hardware

Key specs, side by side

Key sourced specifications for Aferiy P280 and Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
SpecAferiy P280Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
AC-delivered capacity
1,741 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourceaferiy.com2026-07-27
1,279 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com2026-07-04
Continuous power output
2,800 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com
2,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Surge power output
5,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com
3,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Max solar input
1,200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com
900 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
AC charge time (0–100%)
66 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Weight
21.6 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com
23.9 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Rated cycle life
4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceaferiy.com
4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Only show differences
  • AC-delivered capacity1,741 Wh1,279 Wh
  • Continuous power output2,800 W2,000 W
  • Surge power output5,600 W3,600 W
  • Max solar input1,200 W900 W
  • AC charge time (0–100%)66 min
  • Weight21.6 kg23.9 kg

Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.

Where these rank

Quick answers

Is the Aferiy P280 better than the Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
Aferiy P280 leads by 27 points overall.
Which has more usable capacity, the Aferiy P280 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
The Aferiy P280, by 462 Wh — 1,741 Wh versus 1,279 Wh, a 36% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 7.7 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
Which has more AC output, the Aferiy P280 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
The Aferiy P280: 2,800 W versus 2,000 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 2,000 W both run it, above 2,800 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 5,600 W against 3,600 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
How does runtime compare between the Aferiy P280 and Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Aferiy P280 runs longer: 27.6 hours against 20.3. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
Which is lighter, the Aferiy P280 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
The Aferiy P280, by 2.3 kg (21.6 kg versus 23.9 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
Which model should I buy for my use case?
On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Aferiy P280 for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.

Keep deciding

Scores computed from sourced data · prices timestamped · tap or focus a figure to view its source

Some links on this page are affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you.