Anker SOLIX C300
62BatteryRank score · Balanced
← CompareCheck price on Amazon 
Check price on Amazon
Anker SOLIX C300 vs Jackery Explorer 240 v2
Decision readout
Better station
Anker SOLIX C300 leads by 26 points overall.
Jackery Explorer 240 v2
36BatteryRank score · Limited
What changes the decision
- Home backup: Anker SOLIX C300 — more AC-delivered capacity
- Camping & RV: Jackery Explorer 240 v2 — lighter and easier to carry
01 · Score evidence
Score breakdown
62
Anker SOLIX C300
Overall
36
Jackery Explorer 240 v2
51
POWER
Anker SOLIX C300 +23
28
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
77
TRUST
Anker SOLIX C300 +36
41
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
N/A
CHARGING
Incomplete data
44
Wall and solar recharge speed.
58
LIVABILITY
Anker SOLIX C300 +8
50
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
02 · Usable energy
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
Anker SOLIX C300
Rated (on the box)
288 Wh. Show source
claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
AC deliveredmeasured
269 Wh. Show source
verified source~269 Wh usable via USB at 60W (Trusted Reviews)2026-07-04~269 Wh usable via USB at 60W (Trusted Reviews) · 7% below the label
Jackery Explorer 240 v2
Rated (on the box)
256 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcejackery.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
AC delivered (est.)
218 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
03 · Same assumptions
Same-device runtime
| Device | Anker SOLIX C300 | Jackery Explorer 240 v2 | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 3.7 nights | about 3.0 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 0.6 nights | about 0.5 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 4.3 hours | about 3.5 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 15 hours | about 12 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 8.3 hours | about 6.7 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 13 full charges | about 10 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
04 · Sourced hardware
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | Anker SOLIX C300 | Jackery Explorer 240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 269 Whverified. Show sourceverified source~269 Wh usable via USB at 60W (Trusted Reviews)2026-07-04 | 218 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcejackery.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Continuous power output | 300 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 300 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcejackery.com ↗ |
| Surge power output | 600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 500 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcejackery.com ↗ |
| Max solar input | 100 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | — |
| AC charge time (0–100%) | — | 60 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcejackery.com ↗ |
| Weight | 4.1 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 3.5 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcejackery.com ↗ |
| Rated cycle life | 3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcejackery.com ↗ |
Only show differences
- AC-delivered capacity269 Wh218 Wh
- Surge power output600 W500 W
- Max solar input100 W—
- AC charge time (0–100%)—60 min
- Weight4.1 kg3.5 kg
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
- Anker SOLIX C300 #4 of 8 in Quietest Power Stations · #4 of 10 in Best 300 Wh Stations
- Jackery Explorer 240 v2 #10 of 10 in Best 300 Wh Stations
Quick answers
- Is the Anker SOLIX C300 better than the Jackery Explorer 240 v2?
- Anker SOLIX C300 leads by 26 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the Anker SOLIX C300 or Jackery Explorer 240 v2?
- The Anker SOLIX C300, by 51 Wh — 269 Wh versus 218 Wh, a 23% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 0.9 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
- Which has more AC output, the Anker SOLIX C300 or Jackery Explorer 240 v2?
- Neither — both are rated 300 W continuous, so any load one can run, the other can too. Surge headroom follows the same order: 600 W against 500 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
- How does runtime compare between the Anker SOLIX C300 and Jackery Explorer 240 v2?
- On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Anker SOLIX C300 runs longer: 4.3 hours against 3.5. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
- Which is lighter, the Anker SOLIX C300 or Jackery Explorer 240 v2?
- The Jackery Explorer 240 v2, by 0.6 kg (3.5 kg versus 4.1 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Anker SOLIX C300 for home backup; the Jackery Explorer 240 v2 for camping & rv. They split, so the honest answer depends on which of those you are actually buying for.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Anker SOLIX C300 →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Jackery Explorer 240 v2 →
- See more alternatives to Anker SOLIX C300 →
- See more alternatives to Jackery Explorer 240 v2 →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →