
Anker SOLIX C800 X vs Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)

Anker SOLIX C800 X leads by 24 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
- Home backup: Anker SOLIX C800 X — more AC-delivered capacity and higher AC output
- Camping & RV: Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) — lighter and easier to carry
Score breakdown
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
Wall and solar recharge speed.
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
768 Wh. Show source
claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
580 Wh. Show source
verified source~580 Wh extracted at 1200W over 29 min (Trusted Reviews)2026-07-04~580 Wh extracted at 1200W over 29 min (Trusted Reviews) · 24% below the label
677 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
575 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
Same-device runtime
| Device | Anker SOLIX C800 X | Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 8.1 nights | about 8.0 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 1.3 nights | about 1.3 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 9.2 hours | about 9.1 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 32 hours | about 32 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 18 hours | about 18 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 29 full charges | about 28 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | Anker SOLIX C800 X | Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 580 Whverified. Show sourceverified source~580 Wh extracted at 1200W over 29 min (Trusted Reviews)2026-07-04 | 575 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Continuous power output | 1,200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Surge power output | 1,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 1,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Max solar input | 300 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| AC charge time (0–100%) | 58 min. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 102 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Weight | 10.9 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 9.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Rated cycle life | 3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗ | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
- Anker SOLIX C800 X #8 of 10 in Best Power Stations for Photographers & Drones
Quick answers
- Is the Anker SOLIX C800 X better than the Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- Anker SOLIX C800 X leads by 24 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the Anker SOLIX C800 X or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- Neither, in any way you would notice: 580 Wh against 575 Wh is a 0.9% gap, which is smaller than the swing you get from running the same load on a cold morning. Treat them as the same size and decide on output, weight, or today's price instead. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices.
- Which has more AC output, the Anker SOLIX C800 X or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Anker SOLIX C800 X: 1,200 W versus 600 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 600 W both run it, above 1,200 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 1,600 W against 1,000 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
- How does runtime compare between the Anker SOLIX C800 X and Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- They run within 0.9% of each other on the same load — about 9.2 hours each on a refrigerator (full-size). Runtime will not separate these two; the deciding factor is somewhere else.
- Which is lighter, the Anker SOLIX C800 X or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4), by 1.7 kg (9.2 kg versus 10.9 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which recharges faster from the wall, the Anker SOLIX C800 X or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Anker SOLIX C800 X: 58 minutes from empty to full against 102 minutes, a difference of 44 minutes. This matters most between outages and during a short grid window — if you only ever recharge overnight, it does not matter at all.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Anker SOLIX C800 X for home backup; the Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) for camping & rv. They split, so the honest answer depends on which of those you are actually buying for.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Anker SOLIX C800 X →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- See more alternatives to Anker SOLIX C800 X →
- See more alternatives to Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →