
Bluetti AC70 vs Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)

Bluetti AC70 leads by 32 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
- Home backup: Bluetti AC70 — more AC-delivered capacity and higher AC output
- Camping & RV: Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) — lighter and easier to carry
Score breakdown
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
Wall and solar recharge speed.
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
768 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
653 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
677 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
575 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
Same-device runtime
| Device | Bluetti AC70 | Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 9.1 nights | about 8.0 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 1.5 nights | about 1.3 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 10 hours | about 9.1 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 36 hours | about 32 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 20 hours | about 18 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 32 full charges | about 28 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | Bluetti AC70 | Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 653 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcebluettipower.com ↗2026-07-04 | 575 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Continuous power output | 1,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Surge power output | 2,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 1,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Max solar input | 500 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| AC charge time (0–100%) | 75 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 102 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Weight | 10.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 9.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Rated cycle life | 3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
Quick answers
- Is the Bluetti AC70 better than the Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- Bluetti AC70 leads by 32 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the Bluetti AC70 or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Bluetti AC70, by 78 Wh — 653 Wh versus 575 Wh, a 14% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 1.3 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
- Which has more AC output, the Bluetti AC70 or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Bluetti AC70: 1,000 W versus 600 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 600 W both run it, above 1,000 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 2,000 W against 1,000 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
- How does runtime compare between the Bluetti AC70 and Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Bluetti AC70 runs longer: 10.4 hours against 9.1. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
- Which is lighter, the Bluetti AC70 or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4), by 1 kg (9.2 kg versus 10.2 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which recharges faster from the wall, the Bluetti AC70 or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Bluetti AC70: 75 minutes from empty to full against 102 minutes, a difference of 27 minutes. This matters most between outages and during a short grid window — if you only ever recharge overnight, it does not matter at all.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Bluetti AC70 for home backup; the Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) for camping & rv. They split, so the honest answer depends on which of those you are actually buying for.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Bluetti AC70 →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- See more alternatives to Bluetti AC70 →
- See more alternatives to Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →