Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
68BatteryRank score · Balanced
← CompareCheck price on Amazon 
Check price on Amazon
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 vs Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
Decision readout
Better station
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 leads by 21 points overall.
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
47BatteryRank score · Limited
What changes the decision
- Home backup: Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 — more AC-delivered capacity and higher AC output
- Camping & RV: Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 — lighter and easier to carry
By the BatteryRank Engineering Team
01 · Score evidence
Score breakdown
68
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Overall
47
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
63
POWER
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 +36
27
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
80
TRUST
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) +2
82
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
53
CHARGING
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) +23
76
Wall and solar recharge speed.
76
LIVABILITY
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 +50
26
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
02 · Usable energy
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Rated (on the box)
2,048 Wh. Show source
claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
AC delivered (est.)
1,761 Wh. Show source
estimated sourcetrustedreviews.com ↗Trusted Reviews reported 86% of 2,048 Wh delivered on AC · 2026-07-04 · 1,761 Wh derived from that ratio; no direct Wh result statedDerived from a reviewer-reported AC-delivery ratio; the source does not state a direct Wh result. 14% below the label. How we estimate.
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
Rated (on the box)
1,505 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
AC delivered (est.)
1,279 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
03 · Same assumptions
Same-device runtime
| Device | Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 | Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 24.5 nights | about 17.8 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 3.9 nights | about 2.9 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 28 hours | about 20 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 98 hours | about 71 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 54 hours | about 39 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 88 full charges | about 63 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
04 · Sourced hardware
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 | Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 1,761 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcetrustedreviews.com ↗Trusted Reviews reports 86% of 2,048 Wh delivered on AC · 2026-07-04 · 1,761 Wh derived from that ratio; no direct Wh result stated | 1,279 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Continuous power output | 2,400 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04 | 2,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Surge power output | 4,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04 | 3,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Max solar input | 800 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04 | 900 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| AC charge time (0–100%) | 88 min. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04 | 66 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Weight | 18.9 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04 | 23.9 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Rated cycle life | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04 | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
Only show differences
- AC-delivered capacity1,761 Wh1,279 Wh
- Continuous power output2,400 W2,000 W
- Surge power output4,000 W3,600 W
- Max solar input800 W900 W
- AC charge time (0–100%)88 min66 min
- Weight18.9 kg23.9 kg
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
- Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 #4 of 10 in Best 2,000 Wh Stations · #4 of 10 in Best Power Stations for Apartment Outages
Where to buy
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you buy, at no extra cost to you. Commission never affects our rankings.
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)
Quick answers
- Is the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 better than the Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 leads by 21 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2, by 482 Wh — 1,761 Wh versus 1,279 Wh, a 38% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 8 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
- Which has more AC output, the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2: 2,400 W versus 2,000 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 2,000 W both run it, above 2,400 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 4,000 W against 3,600 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
- How does runtime compare between the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 and Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 runs longer: 28 hours against 20.3. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
- Which is lighter, the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2, by 5 kg (18.9 kg versus 23.9 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which recharges faster from the wall, the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 or Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4): 66 minutes from empty to full against 88 minutes, a difference of 22 minutes. This matters most between outages and during a short grid window — if you only ever recharge overnight, it does not matter at all.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- See more alternatives to Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 →
- See more alternatives to Goal Zero Yeti 1500 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →