BatteryRank
Power StationsRankingsWhat Can It Run?CompareToolsGuidesHow we score
← Compare

Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus vs Dabbsson 3000L

Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus — front view

Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus

65BatteryRank score · Balanced
Check price on Amazon
Decision readout
Better station

Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus leads by 10 points overall.

Dabbsson 3000L — front view

Dabbsson 3000L

55BatteryRank score · Balanced
Check price on Amazon
What changes the decision

By the BatteryRank Engineering Team

01 · Score evidence

Score breakdown

65
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
Overall
55
Dabbsson 3000L
81
POWER
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus +42
39

Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.

62
TRUST
Dabbsson 3000L +21
83

Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.

54
CHARGING
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus +4
50

Wall and solar recharge speed.

25
LIVABILITY
Dabbsson 3000L +70
95

Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.

Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.

02 · Usable energy

Capacity truth

The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.

Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus
Rated (on the box)
3,840 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
3,264 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

Dabbsson 3000L
Rated (on the box)
3,072 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
2,611 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

03 · Same assumptions

Same-device runtime

Estimated runtime for the same sourced devices on Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus and Dabbsson 3000L
DeviceAnker SOLIX F3800 PlusDabbsson 3000LAssumption
CPAP (humidifier off)about 45.3 nightsabout 36.3 nights9 W ·
CPAP (heated humidifier on)about 7.3 nightsabout 5.8 nights56 W ·
Refrigerator (full-size)about 52 hoursabout 41 hours180 W × 35% duty cycle ·
Wi-Fi router + modemabout 181 hoursabout 145 hours18 W ·
Laptop (65W charger)about 100 hoursabout 80 hours65 W × 50% duty cycle ·
Phone (one full charge)about 163 full chargesabout 130 full charges20 W ·

One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →

04 · Sourced hardware

Key specs, side by side

Key sourced specifications for Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus and Dabbsson 3000L
SpecAnker SOLIX F3800 PlusDabbsson 3000L
AC-delivered capacity
3,264 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04
2,611 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27
Continuous power output
6,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04
3,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27
Surge power output
9,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04
6,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27
Max solar input
3,200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04
1,200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27
Weight
62 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04
25.8 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27
Rated cycle life
3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-04
4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcedabbsson.com ↗2026-07-27

Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.

Where these rank

Where to buy

Affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you buy, at no extra cost to you. Commission never affects our rankings.

Quick answers

Is the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus better than the Dabbsson 3000L?
Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus leads by 10 points overall.
Which has more usable capacity, the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus or Dabbsson 3000L?
The Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus, by 653 Wh — 3,264 Wh versus 2,611 Wh, a 25% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 10.9 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
Which has more AC output, the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus or Dabbsson 3000L?
The Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus: 6,000 W versus 3,000 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 3,000 W both run it, above 6,000 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 9,000 W against 6,000 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
How does runtime compare between the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus and Dabbsson 3000L?
On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus runs longer: 51.8 hours against 41.4. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
Which is lighter, the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus or Dabbsson 3000L?
The Dabbsson 3000L, by 36.2 kg (25.8 kg versus 62 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
Which model should I buy for my use case?
On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Anker SOLIX F3800 Plus for home backup; the Dabbsson 3000L for camping & rv. They split, so the honest answer depends on which of those you are actually buying for.

Keep deciding

Scores computed from sourced data · prices timestamped · tap or focus a figure to view its source

Some links on this page are affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you.