← Compare

FlashFish A301 vs Goal Zero Yeti 300

FlashFish A301 — front view

FlashFish A301

43BatteryRank score · Limited
Decision readout
Better station

Goal Zero Yeti 300 leads by 28 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 300 — front view

Goal Zero Yeti 300

71BatteryRank score · Excellent
Check price on Amazon
What changes the decision
01 · Score evidence

Score breakdown

43
FlashFish A301
Overall
71
Goal Zero Yeti 300
57
POWER
Goal Zero Yeti 300 +10
67

Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.

18
TRUST
Goal Zero Yeti 300 +80
98

Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.

17
CHARGING
Goal Zero Yeti 300 +74
91

Wall and solar recharge speed.

70
LIVABILITY
FlashFish A301 +66
4

Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.

Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.

02 · Usable energy

Capacity truth

The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.

FlashFish A301
Rated (on the box)
292 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com2026-07-04

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
223 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

Goal Zero Yeti 300
Rated (on the box)
296.96 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourcehelp.goalzero.com2026-07-27

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
252 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

03 · Same assumptions

Same-device runtime

Estimated runtime for the same sourced devices on FlashFish A301 and Goal Zero Yeti 300
DeviceFlashFish A301Goal Zero Yeti 300Assumption
CPAP (humidifier off)about 3.1 nightsabout 3.5 nights9 W ·
CPAP (heated humidifier on)about 0.5 nightsabout 0.6 nights56 W ·
Refrigerator (full-size)about 3.5 hoursabout 4.0 hours180 W × 35% duty cycle ·
Wi-Fi router + modemabout 12 hoursabout 14 hours18 W ·
Laptop (65W charger)about 6.9 hoursabout 7.8 hours65 W × 50% duty cycle ·
Phone (one full charge)about 11 full chargesabout 12 full charges20 W ·

One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →

04 · Sourced hardware

Key specs, side by side

Key sourced specifications for FlashFish A301 and Goal Zero Yeti 300
SpecFlashFish A301Goal Zero Yeti 300
AC-delivered capacity
223 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourceflashfishoutdoor.com2026-07-04
252 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcehelp.goalzero.com2026-07-27
Continuous power output
320 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com
350 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcehelp.goalzero.com
Surge power output
600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com
600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcehelp.goalzero.com
Max solar input
100 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com
200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcehelp.goalzero.com
AC charge time (0–100%)
210 min. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com
Weight
3.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com
6.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcehelp.goalzero.com
Rated cycle life
800 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceflashfishoutdoor.com
4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcehelp.goalzero.com
Only show differences
  • AC-delivered capacity223 Wh252 Wh
  • Continuous power output320 W350 W
  • Max solar input100 W200 W
  • AC charge time (0–100%)210 min
  • Weight3.2 kg6.2 kg
  • Rated cycle life800 cycles4,000 cycles

Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.

Where these rank

Quick answers

Is the FlashFish A301 better than the Goal Zero Yeti 300?
Goal Zero Yeti 300 leads by 28 points overall.
Which has more usable capacity, the FlashFish A301 or Goal Zero Yeti 300?
The Goal Zero Yeti 300, by 29 Wh — 223 Wh versus 252 Wh, a 13% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 0.5 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
Which has more AC output, the FlashFish A301 or Goal Zero Yeti 300?
The Goal Zero Yeti 300: 320 W versus 350 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 320 W both run it, above 350 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 600 W against 600 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
How does runtime compare between the FlashFish A301 and Goal Zero Yeti 300?
On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the Goal Zero Yeti 300 runs longer: 4 hours against 3.5. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
Which is lighter, the FlashFish A301 or Goal Zero Yeti 300?
The FlashFish A301, by 3 kg (3.2 kg versus 6.2 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
Which model should I buy for my use case?
On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Goal Zero Yeti 300 for home backup; the FlashFish A301 for camping & rv. They split, so the honest answer depends on which of those you are actually buying for.

Keep deciding

Scores computed from sourced data · prices timestamped · tap or focus a figure to view its source

Some links on this page are affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you.