Anker SOLIX F3000 vs Bluetti Apex 300

Anker SOLIX F3000

55BatteryRank score · Balanced

Check price on Amazon

Decision readout

Better station

Bluetti Apex 300 leads by 16 points overall.

Bluetti Apex 300

71BatteryRank score · Excellent

Check price on Amazon

What changes the decision

Home backup: Bluetti Apex 300 — higher AC output
Camping & RV: Bluetti Apex 300 — lighter and easier to carry

01 · Score evidence

Score breakdown

Anker SOLIX F3000

Overall

Bluetti Apex 300

POWER

Bluetti Apex 300 +19

Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.

TRUST

Bluetti Apex 300 +4

Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.

CHARGING

Bluetti Apex 300 +6

Wall and solar recharge speed.

LIVABILITY

Bluetti Apex 300 +20

Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.

Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.

02 · Usable energy

Capacity truth

The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.

Anker SOLIX F3000

Rated (on the box)

3,072 Wh

claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-27

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)

2,611 Wh

estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

Bluetti Apex 300

Rated (on the box)

2,764.8 Wh

claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗2026-07-04

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC deliveredmeasured

2,550–2,580 Wh

verified source~2,550-2,580 Wh delivered (Trusted Reviews, ~92-93.5% at load)2026-07-04

~2,550-2,580 Wh delivered (Trusted Reviews, ~92-93.5% at load) · 7% below the label

03 · Same assumptions

Same-device runtime

Estimated runtime for the same sourced devices on Anker SOLIX F3000 and Bluetti Apex 300
Device	Anker SOLIX F3000	Bluetti Apex 300	Assumption
CPAP (humidifier off)	about 36.3 nights	about 35.6 nights	9 W · 2026-07-06
CPAP (heated humidifier on)	about 5.8 nights	about 5.7 nights	56 W · 2026-07-06
Refrigerator (full-size)	about 41 hours	about 41 hours	180 W × 35% duty cycle · 2026-07-06
Wi-Fi router + modem	about 145 hours	about 143 hours	18 W · 2026-07-06
Laptop (65W charger)	about 80 hours	about 79 hours	65 W × 50% duty cycle · 2026-07-06
Phone (one full charge)	about 130 full charges	about 128 full charges	20 W · 2026-07-06

One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →

04 · Sourced hardware

Key specs, side by side

Key sourced specifications for Anker SOLIX F3000 and Bluetti Apex 300
Spec	Anker SOLIX F3000	Bluetti Apex 300
AC-delivered capacity	2,611 Whest.. Show source estimated sourceankersolix.com ↗2026-07-27	2,565 Whverified. Show source verified source~2,550-2,580 Wh delivered (Trusted Reviews, ~92-93.5% at load)2026-07-04
Continuous power output	3,600 W. Show source claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗	3,840 W. Show source claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗
Surge power output	7,200 W. Show source claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗	7,680 W. Show source claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗
Max solar input	2,400 W. Show source claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗	2,400 W. Show source claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗
Weight	41.5 kg. Show source claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗	38 kg. Show source claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗
Rated cycle life	4,000 cycles. Show source claimed sourceankersolix.com ↗	6,000 cycles. Show source claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗

Only show differences

AC-delivered capacity2,611 Wh2,565 Wh
Continuous power output3,600 W3,840 W
Surge power output7,200 W7,680 W
Weight41.5 kg38 kg
Rated cycle life4,000 cycles6,000 cycles

Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.

Where these rank

Anker SOLIX F3000 #4 of 7 in Best 3,000 Wh Stations · #10 of 10 in Best Power Stations for Starlink
Bluetti Apex 300 #1 of 7 in Best 3,000 Wh Stations · #1 of 10 in Longest-Cycle-Life Power Stations

Quick answers

Is the Anker SOLIX F3000 better than the Bluetti Apex 300?: Bluetti Apex 300 leads by 16 points overall.
Which has more usable capacity, the Anker SOLIX F3000 or Bluetti Apex 300?: Neither, in any way you would notice: 2,611 Wh against 2,565 Wh is a 1.8% gap, which is smaller than the swing you get from running the same load on a cold morning. Treat them as the same size and decide on output, weight, or today's price instead. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices.
Which has more AC output, the Anker SOLIX F3000 or Bluetti Apex 300?: The Bluetti Apex 300: 3,600 W versus 3,840 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 3,600 W both run it, above 3,840 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 7,200 W against 7,680 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
How does runtime compare between the Anker SOLIX F3000 and Bluetti Apex 300?: They run within 1.8% of each other on the same load — about 41.4 hours each on a refrigerator (full-size). Runtime will not separate these two; the deciding factor is somewhere else.
Which is lighter, the Anker SOLIX F3000 or Bluetti Apex 300?: The Bluetti Apex 300, by 3.5 kg (38 kg versus 41.5 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
Which model should I buy for my use case?: On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Bluetti Apex 300 for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.

Anker SOLIX F3000 vs Bluetti Apex 300