
Bluetti Apex 300 vs Pecron E3600LFP

Bluetti Apex 300 leads by 10 points overall.

Pecron E3600LFP
- Home backup: Pecron E3600LFP — more AC-delivered capacity
- Camping & RV: Pecron E3600LFP — lighter and easier to carry
Score breakdown
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
Wall and solar recharge speed.
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
2,764.8 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
2,550–2,580 Wh. Show source
verified source~2,550-2,580 Wh delivered (Trusted Reviews, ~92-93.5% at load)2026-07-04~2,550-2,580 Wh delivered (Trusted Reviews, ~92-93.5% at load) · 7% below the label
3,072 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcecdn.shopify.com ↗2026-07-27The marketing number — total cell capacity.
2,611 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
Same-device runtime
| Device | Bluetti Apex 300 | Pecron E3600LFP | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 35.6 nights | about 36.3 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 5.7 nights | about 5.8 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 41 hours | about 41 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 143 hours | about 145 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 79 hours | about 80 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 128 full charges | about 130 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Pecron E3600LFP |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 2,565 Whverified. Show sourceverified source~2,550-2,580 Wh delivered (Trusted Reviews, ~92-93.5% at load)2026-07-04 | 2,611 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcecdn.shopify.com ↗2026-07-27 |
| Continuous power output | 3,840 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 3,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcecdn.shopify.com ↗ |
| Surge power output | 7,680 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | — |
| Max solar input | 2,400 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 2,400 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcecdn.shopify.com ↗ |
| Weight | 38 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 36 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcecdn.shopify.com ↗ |
| Rated cycle life | 6,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcebluettipower.com ↗ | 3,500 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcecdn.shopify.com ↗ |
Only show differences
- AC-delivered capacity2,565 Wh2,611 Wh
- Continuous power output3,840 W3,600 W
- Surge power output7,680 W—
- Weight38 kg36 kg
- Rated cycle life6,000 cycles3,500 cycles
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
- Bluetti Apex 300 #1 of 7 in Best 3,000 Wh Stations · #1 of 10 in Longest-Cycle-Life Power Stations
- Pecron E3600LFP #2 of 7 in Best 3,000 Wh Stations · #7 of 10 in Best Power Stations for Starlink
Quick answers
- Is the Bluetti Apex 300 better than the Pecron E3600LFP?
- Bluetti Apex 300 leads by 10 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the Bluetti Apex 300 or Pecron E3600LFP?
- Neither, in any way you would notice: 2,565 Wh against 2,611 Wh is a 1.8% gap, which is smaller than the swing you get from running the same load on a cold morning. Treat them as the same size and decide on output, weight, or today's price instead. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices.
- Which has more AC output, the Bluetti Apex 300 or Pecron E3600LFP?
- The Bluetti Apex 300: 3,840 W versus 3,600 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 3,600 W both run it, above 3,840 W neither does. Neither model publishes a surge figure we can source, so startup capability is unresolved here — check it before planning around a motor or compressor load.
- How does runtime compare between the Bluetti Apex 300 and Pecron E3600LFP?
- They run within 1.8% of each other on the same load — about 40.7 hours each on a refrigerator (full-size). Runtime will not separate these two; the deciding factor is somewhere else.
- Which is lighter, the Bluetti Apex 300 or Pecron E3600LFP?
- The Pecron E3600LFP, by 2 kg (36 kg versus 38 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the Pecron E3600LFP for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Bluetti Apex 300 →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Pecron E3600LFP →
- See more alternatives to Bluetti Apex 300 →
- See more alternatives to Pecron E3600LFP →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →