
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) vs Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) leads by 21 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
- Home backup: EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) — more AC-delivered capacity and higher AC output
- Camping & RV: EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) — lighter and easier to carry
Score breakdown
Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.
Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.
Wall and solar recharge speed.
Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.
Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.
Capacity truth
The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.
716 Wh. Show source
claimed sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗2026-07-27The marketing number — total cell capacity.
609 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
677 Wh. Show source
claimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04The marketing number — total cell capacity.
575 Wh. Show source
estimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiencyWhat reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.
Same-device runtime
| Device | EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) | Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) | Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPAP (humidifier off) | about 8.5 nights | about 8.0 nights | 9 W · |
| CPAP (heated humidifier on) | about 1.4 nights | about 1.3 nights | 56 W · |
| Refrigerator (full-size) | about 9.7 hours | about 9.1 hours | 180 W × 35% duty cycle · |
| Wi-Fi router + modem | about 34 hours | about 32 hours | 18 W · |
| Laptop (65W charger) | about 19 hours | about 18 hours | 65 W × 50% duty cycle · |
| Phone (one full charge) | about 30 full charges | about 28 full charges | 20 W · |
One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →
Key specs, side by side
| Spec | EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) | Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) |
|---|---|---|
| AC-delivered capacity | 609 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗2026-07-27 | 575 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com ↗2026-07-04 |
| Continuous power output | 800 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗ | 600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Surge power output | 1,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗ | 1,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Max solar input | 220 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗ | 200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| AC charge time (0–100%) | — | 102 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Weight | 7.8 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗ | 9.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
| Rated cycle life | 3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com ↗ | 4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com ↗ |
Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.
Where these rank
- EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) #6 of 10 in Best for Camping · #8 of 10 in Fastest AC-Charging Power Stations
Quick answers
- Is the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) better than the Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) leads by 21 points overall.
- Which has more usable capacity, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700), by 34 Wh — 609 Wh versus 575 Wh, a 6% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 0.6 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
- Which has more AC output, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700): 800 W versus 600 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 600 W both run it, above 800 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 1,600 W against 1,000 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
- How does runtime compare between the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) and Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) runs longer: 9.7 hours against 9.1. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
- Which is lighter, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
- The EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700), by 1.4 kg (7.8 kg versus 9.2 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
- Which model should I buy for my use case?
- On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.
Keep deciding
- Full scorecard, specs & price for EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) →
- Full scorecard, specs & price for Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- See more alternatives to EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) →
- See more alternatives to Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) →
- What size do you need? →
- Browse all rankings →
- Check device runtime evidence →
- Compare outage and trip load plans →
- Browse complete power kits →
- Capacity vs output explained →
- Battery cycle-life thresholds →
- UPS behavior explained →