← Compare

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) vs Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) — front view

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700)

60BatteryRank score · Balanced
Check price on Amazon
Decision readout
Better station

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) leads by 21 points overall.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) — front view

Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)

39BatteryRank score · Limited
Check price on Amazon
What changes the decision
01 · Score evidence

Score breakdown

60
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700)
Overall
39
Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
55
POWER
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) +20
35

Battery-side usable capacity and how much you can run at once.

64
TRUST
Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4) +22
86

Owner reputation, safety record, warranty, and build durability.

74
CHARGING
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) +63
11

Wall and solar recharge speed.

50
LIVABILITY
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) +14
36

Lightweight, portable, and quiet enough to live with.

Computed from sourced data with a published, price-independent formula. Scores are relative to each model's size class.

02 · Usable energy

Capacity truth

The watt-hours on the box aren't what reaches your devices. Same scale, both units.

EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700)
Rated (on the box)
716 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com2026-07-27

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
609 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
Rated (on the box)
677 Wh. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com2026-07-04

The marketing number — total cell capacity.

AC delivered (est.)
575 Wh. Show sourceestimated sourceestimate = battery-side usable capacity × 85% inverter efficiency

What reaches an AC outlet — about 15% is lost turning battery power into household AC. How we estimate.

03 · Same assumptions

Same-device runtime

Estimated runtime for the same sourced devices on EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) and Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
DeviceEcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700)Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)Assumption
CPAP (humidifier off)about 8.5 nightsabout 8.0 nights9 W ·
CPAP (heated humidifier on)about 1.4 nightsabout 1.3 nights56 W ·
Refrigerator (full-size)about 9.7 hoursabout 9.1 hours180 W × 35% duty cycle ·
Wi-Fi router + modemabout 34 hoursabout 32 hours18 W ·
Laptop (65W charger)about 19 hoursabout 18 hours65 W × 50% duty cycle ·
Phone (one full charge)about 30 full chargesabout 28 full charges20 W ·

One device at a time; estimates use each station's usable AC energy. Build your own load →

04 · Sourced hardware

Key specs, side by side

Key sourced specifications for EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) and Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
SpecEcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700)Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)
AC-delivered capacity
609 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourceus.ecoflow.com2026-07-27
575 Whest.. Show sourceestimated sourcegoalzero.com2026-07-04
Continuous power output
800 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com
600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Surge power output
1,600 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com
1,000 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Max solar input
220 W. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com
200 W. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
AC charge time (0–100%)
102 min. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Weight
7.8 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com
9.2 kg. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com
Rated cycle life
3,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourceus.ecoflow.com
4,000 cycles. Show sourceclaimed sourcegoalzero.com

Manufacturer figures unless marked verified or est. Tap or focus a figure to view its source. The better reading in each row is highlighted — lower wins for weight and recharge time.

Where these rank

Quick answers

Is the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) better than the Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) leads by 21 points overall.
Which has more usable capacity, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
The EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700), by 34 Wh — 609 Wh versus 575 Wh, a 6% advantage. At a 60 W load that is roughly 0.6 extra hours before the battery is empty. Both figures are estimated AC-delivered energy, not the nameplate battery rating — the watt-hours that actually reach your devices, which is always less than the number on the box.
Which has more AC output, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
The EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700): 800 W versus 600 W continuous. That gap matters only if a load sits between the two numbers — below 600 W both run it, above 800 W neither does. Surge headroom follows the same order: 1,600 W against 1,000 W, and surge is what decides whether a compressor or pump actually starts.
How does runtime compare between the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) and Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
On the same sourced load — a refrigerator (full-size) — the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) runs longer: 9.7 hours against 9.1. These are planning estimates from each model's AC-delivered capacity, not stopwatch tests; real duty cycle and temperature move them.
Which is lighter, the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) or Goal Zero Yeti 700 6th gen (LiFePO4)?
The EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700), by 1.4 kg (7.8 kg versus 9.2 kg). Both weights are manufacturer figures for the bare unit; cables and a solar panel add to whatever you actually carry.
Which model should I buy for my use case?
On the sub-scores that describe each use case: the EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro (700) for home backup, camping & rv. One model leads every use case we score here, which makes this an unusually clean choice.

Keep deciding

Scores computed from sourced data · prices timestamped · tap or focus a figure to view its source

Some links on this page are affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you.