- How much power do you need for Starlink and a camping fridge?
- 2,368 Wh of delivered energy over 2 days, drawing 185 W if every device runs at once. Starlink (Standard kit) alone is 51% of that energy, so it is the load worth measuring first — the rest of the manifest barely moves the answer.
- What decides whether a station can start this setup?
- Nothing in this manifest has a motor or compressor start above its running draw, so the 185 W continuous figure is the real inverter requirement. That is unusual — most outage plans are gated by a startup spike rather than by running watts.
- Does running the DC loads on 12 V actually change the result?
- Yes. 12V camping fridge (45L) is planned on the station's DC output, which skips the inverter conversion entirely. The same hardware on an AC outlet would draw the same work from the battery plus the conversion overhead, and over 2 days that difference compounds.
- Does a 200 W panel keep up with this?
- Not quite, and it is still most of the battle. The modelled harvest is 560 Wh a day against 1,184 Wh of draw, so the panel covers about 47% and turns the net drain into 624 Wh. On the same battery that stretches a two-day plan to nearly four days, which is the difference between a weekend and a trip.
- What happens if a second laptop joins the trip?
- The day goes to 1,444 Wh, about 22% more, and the running total to 250 W — which every station in the catalogue except the smallest still clears without thinking. Nothing structural changes. This plan scales by addition rather than by tier, which is unusual enough on this site to be worth saying out loud: most manifests break at a threshold, and this one just gets gradually bigger.
- Should the fridge go off overnight to save power?
- No, and the arithmetic says the idea is not even tempting. The fridge is 324 Wh across a full twenty-four hours, so twelve hours off saves at most 162 Wh — less than three hours of the dish — while every degree the box warms has to be pulled back out in the morning. Cold is the one thing on this plan that is cheaper to hold than to recover.